Blog and News

"Docs4PatientCare.org is a politically neutral grassroots coalition of physicians.  Use of any politically partisan terms does not reflect the position of Docs4PatientCare.org.  We do encourage our speakers to express how they feel and we post articles based on their informative content only.  Any politically partisan language used does not reflect the group as a whole.  Specific party or political allegiances and opposition are not our intent.  The goal of D4PC is only to advocate for effective and responsible health care reform."

British Health System Continues Rationing, Denies Patients Access to Breakthrough Drugs

Thursday, May 03, 2012

According to PharmaTimes Online, Britain's National Institutes of Health are denying lupus patients access to the first new drug for this disease in 50 years. PharmaTimes reports NIH "concluded that Benlysta (belimumab) could not be considered a cost-effective use of NHS resources for patients with active autoantibody positive systemic lupus erythematosus with a high degree of disease activity despite standard therapy." 

Read More

Obamacare's Medical Mercenaries, The American Spectator

Sunday, April 29, 2012

The unelected American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation (ABIMF) and its unelected proxies are working hard to get doctors to implement the health law by encouraging them not to diagnose their patients too often. The foundation's "Choosing Wisely" campaign is framed as a voluntary program to encourage doctors to cut down on "unnecessary medical tests."

It is designed to give the doctor's seal of approval to Obamacare's practice guidelines and rationing. And it's the blueprint for the campaign ABIMF is underwriting to get doctors to change how they practice medicine in order to bring about the Obamacare revolution.

 

Read More

Obamacare Knows Best?

Friday, March 09, 2012
 

Read More

Meet The Obamacare Mandate Committee, Wall Street Journal

Monday, February 27, 2012
Under ObamaCare, a single committee—the United States Preventative Services Task Force—is empowered to evaluate preventive health services and decide which will be covered by health-insurance plans. Americans first became familiar with the task force in November 2009, when it made the controversial decision to recommend that women ages 40-49 shouldn't get routine mammograms. More recently, it rebuffed routine prostate-cancer screening and the use of tests that detect the viruses that can cause cervical cancer. 

Read More

The Real Truth Beyond Berwick's Failure to Gain Senate Confirmation & His Resignation

Thursday, December 01, 2011

President Obama recess appointed Donald Berwick to the post of CMS administrator last year to avoid a messy Senate confirmation hearing during which Berwick's prior comments about embracing health care rationing were sure to be a topic of interest. Senate Republicans were all too willing to hold the hearing - it was Senate Democrats who did not want the hearing and President Obama obliged his former Democratic colleagues by making a recess appointment. 

Read More

Berwick Resigns

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

The Washington Post is reporting that CMS Administrator Donald Berwick, a vocal supporter of health care rationing, has decided to resign his post. Berwick was recess-appointed to the position by President Obama to circumvent the need for a Senate confirmation vote. The Democratic Majority on the Finance Committee was unwilling to schedule a hearing on the nominee in 2010 prior to the mid-term elections. 

Read More

D4PC "Morning Rounds" Monday, November 21, 2011

Monday, November 21, 2011

Welcome to D4PC "Morning Rounds", your daily review of healthcare news and information from Washington, DC and around the nation. These briefings will keep you up to date on recent developments and our effort to replace the PPACA with patient-centered reforms that protect the doctor-patient relationship and preserve individual freedom of choice. 

Read More

Haynes: Healthcare Rationing George Orwell-Style

Monday, September 05, 2011

D4PC Board Member Beth Haynes spoke out on TownHall.com on the myriad ways the government rations access to health care:

"Just over a year ago, the Christian Science Monitor reported on an antitrust case by the Department of Justice against Idaho orthopedists who, in refusing to accept government price controls, were found guilty of 'price fixing.' The DOJ hubristically declared, 'Government prices are market prices.' In this Orwellian move, the government declared voluntary prices to be price-fixing, and government-determined prices to be market prices. Anyone with common sense can see that changing terminology does not change reality. 

Read More

What Does the IPAB Tell Us About Progressives?, covertrationingblog.com

Friday, July 01, 2011

“IPAB” might be a new term to many Americans, but it is a very necessary AND scary "lynchpin" of Obamacare.  The IPAB is actually all-powerful.

For all practical purposes, the cost-cutting “recommendations” which the IPAB would “propose” for “consideration” will be implemented nearly automatically, with the full authority of the Federal government.  And, for all practical purposes, the IPAB will become a new agency of the executive branch, with near-dictatorial authority to cut healthcare spending where and when and for whom it sees fit.

Section 10320 (which can be found way down on page 2210 of the new law) grants the IPAB (beginning in 2015) the authority to limit all healthcare expenditures, that is, all healthcare expenditures, and not just expenditures by Medicare or government-run programs.

Furthermore, it designates that these “recommendations” may be implemented by the Secretary of HHS or other Federal agencies “administratively” (that is, without the interference of Congress).

While the IPAB may begin by only controlling the cost of Medicare, it already has the authority to control all healthcare spending, including private spending. 

Section 3403, the section that creates the IPAB and spells out its functions, contains some remarkable language that, most likely, has never been seen before in American legislative history. To wit:

“It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.”

So, the astounding truth, is that the IPAB and all its designated dictatorial functions are in force for perpetuity. Our Congress has passed legislation that purports to bind all future Congresses from altering it in any way.


 

Read More

IPAB: The Acronym that Ate Health Care

Friday, June 10, 2011

Stanley Kurtz writes on National Review Online:

"The 2012 election, and the existence of a free health-care market in this country, could well depend on a little-known agency called IPAB. [Short for Independent Payment Advisory Board, it is], a vastly powerful but too often overlooked component of the president’s health-care-reform law. IPAB has not yet come into existence, but when Obamacare goes into full effect, it will be an unelected and unaccountable bureaucratic entity with nearly limitless power over federal Medicare spending. IPAB will have the power to effectively ration health care through price controls — which may not even be the scariest thing about it. That distinction arguably falls to its unprecedented overriding of congressional sovereignty, in flagrant violation of the constitutional separation of powers."

In his April 13 speech, in response to Paul Ryan’s deficit-reduction plan, President Obama pushed to give IPAB more power and more authority over Medicare pricing as part of the President's own deficit-reduction plan. Kurtz characterized the President's speech as calling for "a substantial expansion of IPAB’s already unprecedented powers," and noted that "Obama can’t begin to match Ryan’s deficit-reduction program without massive, IPAB-imposed health-care controls that would amount to rationing."

In contrast, Paul Ryan and the House Republicans have offered an alternative about which Kurtz has said: "The advantage of the Ryan plan... is its reliance on patient choice. Having been taxed throughout their working lives to support a system that offers no choice, Medicare-dependent patients lose control of funds they might otherwise have used to purchase private health insurance. Ryan’s plan returns some of that money to Americans via a tax-supported health-care voucher. This allows consumers to choose the private insurance plan that most closely matches their priorities — devoting more or less resources to end-of-life care, for example."

Read the full article here...  

Read More


Recent Posts


Tags


Archive